<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Azadirachtin Done</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reactivereports.com/chemistry-blog/azadirachtin-done.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reactivereports.com/chemistry-blog/azadirachtin-done.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:08:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivereports.com/chemistry-blog/azadirachtin-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/chemistry-news/?p=60#comment-323</guid>
		<description>I spoke with the RSC&#039;s Alan McNaught who is on the IUPAC committee and he explained how such a name change might not come about.

&quot;IUPAC doesn&#039;t have a mechanism for approving so-called trivial names for natural products (i.e. names that you can&#039;t immediately decode to a structure) - it&#039;s for the community to reach informal consensus over such matters, and then for IUPAC to use such names as basis for naming natural product parent hydrides.

I think it would be next to impossible to persuade the community that this kind of thing should be handled in a more formal way - usually the &#039;discoverer&#039; comes up with a name that the community accepts. In fact there are surprisingly few cases where more than one name is widely used for a new natural product. My feeling is that it would be very difficult to get people using a different name instead of the well-established azadirachtin, however well-founded the arguments for doing so (never mind the potential literature confusion).&quot;

So, sorry Venkat, I think we&#039;ll have to find an alternative method of honoring the name of Dr T.R. Govindachari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with the RSC&#8217;s Alan McNaught who is on the IUPAC committee and he explained how such a name change might not come about.</p>
<p>&#8220;IUPAC doesn&#8217;t have a mechanism for approving so-called trivial names for natural products (i.e. names that you can&#8217;t immediately decode to a structure) &#8211; it&#8217;s for the community to reach informal consensus over such matters, and then for IUPAC to use such names as basis for naming natural product parent hydrides.</p>
<p>I think it would be next to impossible to persuade the community that this kind of thing should be handled in a more formal way &#8211; usually the &#8216;discoverer&#8217; comes up with a name that the community accepts. In fact there are surprisingly few cases where more than one name is widely used for a new natural product. My feeling is that it would be very difficult to get people using a different name instead of the well-established azadirachtin, however well-founded the arguments for doing so (never mind the potential literature confusion).&#8221;</p>
<p>So, sorry Venkat, I think we&#8217;ll have to find an alternative method of honoring the name of Dr T.R. Govindachari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivereports.com/chemistry-blog/azadirachtin-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/chemistry-news/?p=60#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea. Perhaps you could organise a petition and approach IUPAC with the suggestion. I have a contact I could ask whether this kind of change is ever possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea. Perhaps you could organise a petition and approach IUPAC with the suggestion. I have a contact I could ask whether this kind of change is ever possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivereports.com/chemistry-blog/azadirachtin-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/chemistry-news/?p=60#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Dr.T.R. Govindachari was my professor in the Presidency College in Chennai 50 years ago. He was considered the neem expert even then. This molecule could be renamed after him as &quot;Govindirachtin&quot;

Venkat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr.T.R. Govindachari was my professor in the Presidency College in Chennai 50 years ago. He was considered the neem expert even then. This molecule could be renamed after him as &#8220;Govindirachtin&#8221;</p>
<p>Venkat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

