The Guardian post from 2002 is yet another piece of scaremongering properganda penned by a scientist whose livelyhood is funded by the medical profession.

But, like I said I’ve previously written about this area and in essence agree – http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mmr-and-statistics.html

The billions of people PREhistory about which you speak did not live under the same environmental conditions as historically where humans have been subject to environmental aspects not conducive to health.

Following a raw vegan diet IS living to our biological nature. Take a look at The China Study: http://www.thechinastudy.com/.

And look at chimpanzees, with whom we share around 98% of our DNA. They don’t have a high mortality rate. They mostly live to 40/50 years, which is their natural biological lifespan. And what do they eat? A raw vegan (apart from aphids/termites etc.) diet. Chimps do eat meat occasionally; not for nutritional gain, but rather as a means to make political bonds. I suggest the ‘hunter’ element of the scavenger hunter-gatherers was for the same reason. The most health-giving diet to maximise human biological requirements does not include meat.

Obvious up-front risks? Do the research. See the start of my last post: “It is well-documented that steep falls in fatal diseases which are now routinely vaccinated against, e.g. diphtheria, measles and whooping cough, occurred BEFORE the introduction of vaccination. Indeed, death rates had fallen by as much as 95% in the pre-vaccine era.”

The information is out there, but you do have to look!

This highlights the case nicely from 2002 – http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2002/jan/21/publichealth

I don’t think that following a vegan diet is living to our biological nature – we are most likely to have been scavenger hunter-gatherers millennia before we could hunt or farm, so have most likely always had meat in our diets. Dairy no, but meat yes.

Of course the industry has a vested interest and people do need to be properly informed, but not vaccinating against obvious up-front risks seems blinkered.

It is well-documented that steep falls in these fatal diseases which are now routinely vaccinated against, e.g. diphtheria, measles and whooping cough, occurred BEFORE the introduction of vaccination. Indeed, death rates had fallen by as much as 95% in the pre-vaccine era.

The natural biological lifespan of a human is around 80 to 100 years and always has been. There are numberous records of peoples from different cultures living for this length of time throughout history.

The life expectancy that you refer to relates to the past 2,000 years or so – mediaval times, the industrial revolution etc. The average life expectancy of a human that isn’t exposed to damp and squallid living, working and sleeping conditions but to a clean, warm, dry environment, who washes their hands after going to the toilet, who takes moderate exercise, breathes fresh air, drinks clean water and eats an organic, raw vegan diet (i.e. is living according to their biological nature) will live on average into their 80s and beyond. NO VACCINATIONS REQUIRED (in fact, vaccinations reduce longevity – they are poisons injected directly into the bloodstream which weaken the immune system).

Check out the statistics: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/clifford.g.miller/risks.html#Government_Scaremongering

There’s a good reason why most people vaccinate: FEAR – Backed by multibillion dollar industries. And IGNORANCE – the facts are out there – but too much is at stake economically. Glaxosmithkline etc. need to people to remain ignorant. Remove the blinkers.